Civil
Liberties are a huge focus for my American Studies class. Recently we’ve spent
a lot of time talking about our freedoms and when, if ever, they should be
limited. We’ve been thinking the amount of control the government has over the
media and how that can effect what the public knows. I had never really
realized before how huge this impact was until I stumbled across this story
about what Russians are being told about Putin's military invasion of Ukraine.
Instead
of “Ukraine readies for an invasion by Russia” and “PM says Ukraine on the
brink of disaster” (headlines from US and Western Europe), the Russian headlines
read, “Tea, sandwiches, music, photos with self-defense forces mark peaceful
Sunday in Simferopol”.
The above image was accompanied by the live pro-Russia Rally
being held in Simferopol, Ukraine. The media chose to focus solely on this one
pro-Russia event instead of Putin's military intervention that took place in
Crimea, Ukraine, not Simferopol. In showing this instead of the pictures of the
burnings or of the wounded, Russia is morphing the situation into something
that can only reassure the Russian people that the invasion is going well and
is remaining peaceful.
I believe that in showing this only
positive viewpoint the media is unfairly hiding this serious situation in
Crimea. Although this is a perilous time, by highlighting the pro-Russia rally
instead of the negative sides of the invasion, they are in no way protecting
the Russian citizens and therefore they should be showing the negative aspects
as well. There are two sides to every story, and shouldn’t the people of Russia
be entitled to both?
No comments:
Post a Comment